Could < should < did

There are three levels of credibility in writing. You can make your writing more persuasive by moving up the hierarchy.

I like to think of them as could, should, and did:

  • Could: the writer talks about things you, the reader, could do, in a theoretical and abstract sense. Their recommendation is simply a summary of other sources of information, and based on no firsthand experience (and should probably be disregarded). Most content marketing lives inescapably in "could" territory.
  • Should: the writer is brave enough to voice an opinion (hooray!). They seem to have evaluated more than one methodology or idea, and performed a little synthesis to turn multiple ideas into a concrete recommendation. They seem willing to stand behind their recommendation (at least a little).
  • Did: rarest of all, the writer is willing to their own medicine and actually do the thing they talk about. They write from firsthand experience, either sharing past experience or testing their ideas through experimentation. Their writing is more than an academic exercise—they have skin in the game. This is the gold standard, and their advice is probably worth paying attention to.
Ryan Law

Ryan Law is the creator of Ash Tales and the author of the post-apocalyptic fantasy series The Rainmaker Writings.

Ryan has a 15-year long obsession with the end of the world, and has spent that time researching everything from homesteading to nuclear fallout patterns.

Ryan is a wilderness hiker and has trained with bushcraft and survival experts around the UK.

Previous
Previous

Never outsource understanding

Next
Next

How to live as a ghost(writer)